<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bluetooth 3.0&#8230; in Time for iPhone 3.0?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tipb.com/2009/04/10/bluetooth-30-time-iphone-30/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tipb.com/2009/04/10/bluetooth-30-time-iphone-30/</link>
	<description>The #1 iPhone, iPad, and iPod touch Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 02:08:21 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Big Willie</title>
		<link>http://www.tipb.com/2009/04/10/bluetooth-30-time-iphone-30/comment-page-1/#comment-40497</link>
		<dc:creator>Big Willie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 11:48:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theiphoneblog.com/?p=7989#comment-40497</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;If I&#039;m not mistaken, this higher bandwidth will allow for higher quality sounding stereo bluetooth headphones. The fidelity in current sets are less than acceptable. We&#039;ll just have to see if this makes possible home stereo systems being able to utilize the HD audio streams and codecs via bluetooth, or maybe I&#039;m jumping way ahead of current technology?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I&#8217;m not mistaken, this higher bandwidth will allow for higher quality sounding stereo bluetooth headphones. The fidelity in current sets are less than acceptable. We&#8217;ll just have to see if this makes possible home stereo systems being able to utilize the HD audio streams and codecs via bluetooth, or maybe I&#8217;m jumping way ahead of current technology?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edisontiger</title>
		<link>http://www.tipb.com/2009/04/10/bluetooth-30-time-iphone-30/comment-page-1/#comment-40437</link>
		<dc:creator>Edisontiger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 20:48:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theiphoneblog.com/?p=7989#comment-40437</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks rpv. I can&#039;t believe the difference. Thanks agian.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks rpv. I can&#8217;t believe the difference. Thanks agian.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Omari James</title>
		<link>http://www.tipb.com/2009/04/10/bluetooth-30-time-iphone-30/comment-page-1/#comment-40335</link>
		<dc:creator>Omari James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 03:04:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theiphoneblog.com/?p=7989#comment-40335</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;WOW. Sounds like it will probably have something to do with BT Tethering. I doubt it has anything to do with sending files over BT since I haven&#039;t heard any news about Apple enabling that.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WOW. Sounds like it will probably have something to do with BT Tethering. I doubt it has anything to do with sending files over BT since I haven&#8217;t heard any news about Apple enabling that.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rpv</title>
		<link>http://www.tipb.com/2009/04/10/bluetooth-30-time-iphone-30/comment-page-1/#comment-40313</link>
		<dc:creator>rpv</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 01:12:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theiphoneblog.com/?p=7989#comment-40313</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;No way, nobody will be able to implement this standard so quickly.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;@Edisontiger: BT 2.0 is up to 2.1Mbit/s, BT 3.0 should be up to 480Mbit/s&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No way, nobody will be able to implement this standard so quickly.</p>

<p>@Edisontiger: BT 2.0 is up to 2.1Mbit/s, BT 3.0 should be up to 480Mbit/s</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edisontiger</title>
		<link>http://www.tipb.com/2009/04/10/bluetooth-30-time-iphone-30/comment-page-1/#comment-40310</link>
		<dc:creator>Edisontiger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 00:56:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theiphoneblog.com/?p=7989#comment-40310</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;How much faster are they projecting the BT 3.0 is going to be compared to BT 2.0.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How much faster are they projecting the BT 3.0 is going to be compared to BT 2.0.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Muero</title>
		<link>http://www.tipb.com/2009/04/10/bluetooth-30-time-iphone-30/comment-page-1/#comment-40297</link>
		<dc:creator>Muero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 23:32:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theiphoneblog.com/?p=7989#comment-40297</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Would a new Bluetooth version require new hardware chips, or can it work on older hardware, like the iPhone 3G?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would a new Bluetooth version require new hardware chips, or can it work on older hardware, like the iPhone 3G?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

